{"id":15556,"date":"2023-02-14T13:40:51","date_gmt":"2023-02-14T12:40:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/?post_type=documentations&#038;p=15556"},"modified":"2023-03-29T14:54:10","modified_gmt":"2023-03-29T13:54:10","slug":"septembre-2014","status":"publish","type":"documentations","link":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Septembre 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>ARR\u00caTS DE LA COUR DE CASSATION DEPUIS LE 1er JUILLET 2014 | Lettre de l\u2019 AFA n\u00b013<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00ab Cass. 1\u00e8re Civ. 9 juillet 2014 n\u00b013-17495<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Application du principe comp\u00e9tence-comp\u00e9tence (Art. 1448 CPC)<br \/>\nLe caract\u00e8re manifeste de la nullit\u00e9 ou de l\u2019inapplicabilit\u00e9 de la clause compromissoire est rarement admis par la Cour de Cassation car elle estime qu\u2019il doit se constater comme un fait, sans que soit n\u00e9cessaire aucun raisonnement ou discussion.<br \/>\nLa particularit\u00e9 de cette esp\u00e8ce mettant en cause quatre parties dont deux compagnies d\u2019assurances, l\u2019une intervenant au titre d\u2019une r\u00e9assurance, tient en ce que la Cour de Cassation a distributivement appliqu\u00e9 d\u2019une part le principe comp\u00e9tence- comp\u00e9tence pour trois d\u2019entre elles (A, B et C) mais pour deux autres (A et D) a constat\u00e9 l\u2019inapplicabilit\u00e9 de la clause compromissoire. \u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/La-Lettre-de-lA.F.A.-n\u00b013-Septembre-2014-2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Lire la rubrique de Bertrand Moreau, Pr\u00e9sident du Comit\u00e9 de l\u2019arbitrage de l\u2019 AFA<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ARR\u00caTS DE LA COUR DE CASSATION DEPUIS LE 1er JUILLET 2014 | Lettre de l\u2019 AFA n\u00b013 \u00ab Cass. 1\u00e8re Civ. 9 juillet 2014 n\u00b013-17495 Application du principe comp\u00e9tence-comp\u00e9tence (Art. 1448 CPC) Le caract\u00e8re manifeste de la nullit\u00e9 ou de l\u2019inapplicabilit\u00e9 de la clause compromissoire est rarement admis par la Cour de Cassation car elle estime qu\u2019il doit se constater comme un fait, sans que soit n\u00e9cessaire aucun raisonnement ou discussion. La particularit\u00e9 de cette esp\u00e8ce mettant en cause quatre parties dont deux compagnies d\u2019assurances, l\u2019une intervenant au titre d\u2019une r\u00e9assurance, tient en ce que la Cour de Cassation a&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Septembre 2014<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"template":"","documentation_category":[103],"class_list":["post-15556","documentations","type-documentations","status-publish","hentry","documentation_category-jurisprudence","entry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Septembre 2014 - Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Septembre 2014 - Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ARR\u00caTS DE LA COUR DE CASSATION DEPUIS LE 1er JUILLET 2014 | Lettre de l\u2019 AFA n\u00b013 \u00ab Cass. 1\u00e8re Civ. 9 juillet 2014 n\u00b013-17495 Application du principe comp\u00e9tence-comp\u00e9tence (Art. 1448 CPC) Le caract\u00e8re manifeste de la nullit\u00e9 ou de l\u2019inapplicabilit\u00e9 de la clause compromissoire est rarement admis par la Cour de Cassation car elle estime qu\u2019il doit se constater comme un fait, sans que soit n\u00e9cessaire aucun raisonnement ou discussion. La particularit\u00e9 de cette esp\u00e8ce mettant en cause quatre parties dont deux compagnies d\u2019assurances, l\u2019une intervenant au titre d\u2019une r\u00e9assurance, tient en ce que la Cour de Cassation a&hellip; Continue reading Septembre 2014\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-03-29T13:54:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minuto\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/\",\"name\":\"Septembre 2014 - Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-14T12:40:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-29T13:54:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Bienvenida\",\"item\":\"\/es\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Documentations\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Septembre 2014\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/\",\"name\":\"Association Fran\u00e7aise d'Arbitrage\",\"description\":\"Arbitrage interne et international\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Association Fran\u00e7aise d'Arbitrage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/AFA_logo_header_clear_long.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/AFA_logo_header_clear_long.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":60,\"caption\":\"Association Fran\u00e7aise d'Arbitrage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Septembre 2014 - Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Septembre 2014 - Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage","og_description":"ARR\u00caTS DE LA COUR DE CASSATION DEPUIS LE 1er JUILLET 2014 | Lettre de l\u2019 AFA n\u00b013 \u00ab Cass. 1\u00e8re Civ. 9 juillet 2014 n\u00b013-17495 Application du principe comp\u00e9tence-comp\u00e9tence (Art. 1448 CPC) Le caract\u00e8re manifeste de la nullit\u00e9 ou de l\u2019inapplicabilit\u00e9 de la clause compromissoire est rarement admis par la Cour de Cassation car elle estime qu\u2019il doit se constater comme un fait, sans que soit n\u00e9cessaire aucun raisonnement ou discussion. La particularit\u00e9 de cette esp\u00e8ce mettant en cause quatre parties dont deux compagnies d\u2019assurances, l\u2019une intervenant au titre d\u2019une r\u00e9assurance, tient en ce que la Cour de Cassation a&hellip; Continue reading Septembre 2014","og_url":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/","og_site_name":"Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage","article_modified_time":"2023-03-29T13:54:10+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Tiempo de lectura":"1 minuto"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/","url":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/","name":"Septembre 2014 - Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-02-14T12:40:51+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-29T13:54:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/septembre-2014\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Bienvenida","item":"\/es"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Documentations","item":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/documentations\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Septembre 2014"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/","name":"Association Fran\u00e7aise d'Arbitrage","description":"Arbitrage interne et international","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#organization","name":"Association Fran\u00e7aise d'Arbitrage","url":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/AFA_logo_header_clear_long.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/AFA_logo_header_clear_long.png","width":500,"height":60,"caption":"Association Fran\u00e7aise d'Arbitrage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documentations\/15556\/"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documentations\/"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documentations\/"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/?parent=15556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"documentation_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documentation_category\/?post=15556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}