{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/","author_name":"Amaury Catrice","author_url":"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/author\/amaury-catrice\/","title":"D\u00e9cembre 2012 - Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EtRA6CuhkG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/documentations\/decembre-2012\/\">D\u00e9cembre 2012<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.afa-arbitrage.com\/es\/documentations\/decembre-2012\/embed\/#?secret=EtRA6CuhkG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00abD\u00e9cembre 2012\u00bb \u2014 Association Fran\u00e7aise d&#039;Arbitrage\" data-secret=\"EtRA6CuhkG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"DE L\u2019OBLIGATION D\u2019IND\u00c9PENDANCE A L\u2019OBLIGATION DE R\u00c9V\u00c9LATION Cassation 1\u00e8re Chambre civile, 10 octobre 2012, n\u00b0 11-20299 : \u00ab La Cour de cassation, Premi\u00e8re Chambre civile, a rendu l\u2019arr\u00eat suivant : Sur le moyen unique pris en ses diverses branches : Vu l\u2019article 1484, 2\u00b0, du code de proc\u00e9dure civile dans sa r\u00e9daction ant\u00e9rieure \u00e0 celle issue du d\u00e9cret du 13 janvier 2011 ; Attendu, selon l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Tecso s\u2019est vue confier l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de diverses prestations pour la r\u00e9alisation d\u2019un r\u00e9seau de gaz, vapeur et eaux d\u2019une usine de production d\u2019\u00e9lectricit\u00e9 par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Neoelectra Group, qui a&hellip; Continue reading Untitled"}